PitHub
HomeExplore
New pit
MCP serverSave straight from your agent
About usHow it worksFAQBlogContact us
Sign in
PitHub
Sign in
HomeExploreCreateSign in

Explore

Loading…

Explore

Tagged #reasoning

ActiveNewMost usedRecommended
AllAI & Prompt Engineering324Engineering176Data & Analytics89Product4Design28Sales2Marketing4Finance
#reasoningClear filters
NONoor Grant@noorgrant·4w ago

ChatGPT was overcomplicating a useful second-opinion prompt, so I reset the question

Not magic wording, just enough context and a clear definition of done. Easy to adapt.

Noor Grant

Be blunt about my plan for a useful second-opinion prompt. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

ChatGPTgpt-5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.

Show all 3 messages
3412.4k
NONoor Grant@noorgrant·3mo ago

I needed a usable answer on a useful second-opinion prompt

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Noor Grant

I am stuck on a useful second-opinion prompt. I need to challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3313.8k
NONoor Grant@noorgrant·2mo ago

The question that cleaned up a useful second-opinion prompt

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Noor Grant

Help me challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For a useful second-opinion prompt, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
341936
ISIsaac Park@isaacpark·2w ago

Forked from@noorgrant/The question that cleaned up a useful second-opinion prompt

The question that cleaned up a useful second-opinion prompt

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Isaac Park

Help me challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For a useful second-opinion prompt, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
3200
NINia Wright@niawright·2w ago

Forked from@noorgrant/I needed a usable answer on a useful second-opinion prompt

I needed a usable answer on a useful second-opinion prompt

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Nia Wright

I am stuck on a useful second-opinion prompt. I need to challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3200
INInes Navarro@inesnavarro·2w ago

Forked from@noorgrant/I stopped guessing about a useful second-opinion prompt

I stopped guessing about a useful second-opinion prompt

I wanted help with a useful second-opinion prompt without pretending the model knew facts I had not provided.

Ines Navarro

For a useful second-opinion prompt, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For a useful second-opinion prompt, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages
3200
NINia Costa@niacosta·2w ago

Forked from@noorgrant/a useful second-opinion prompt, minus the vague advice

a useful second-opinion prompt, minus the vague advice

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Nia Costa

Give me a short checklist for a useful second-opinion prompt. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Put the source of truth in the prompt - [ ] Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - [ ] Add a stop condition before tool use - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages
3200
AMAmara Sato@amarasato·2w ago

Forked from@noorgrant/ChatGPT was overcomplicating a useful second-opinion prompt, so I reset the question

ChatGPT was overcomplicating a useful second-opinion prompt, so I reset the question

Not magic wording, just enough context and a clear definition of done. Easy to adapt.

Amara Sato

Be blunt about my plan for a useful second-opinion prompt. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

ChatGPTgpt-5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.

Show all 3 messages
3200
NONoor Grant@noorgrant·2mo ago

I stopped guessing about a useful second-opinion prompt

I wanted help with a useful second-opinion prompt without pretending the model knew facts I had not provided.

Noor Grant

For a useful second-opinion prompt, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For a useful second-opinion prompt, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages
331993
NONoor Grant@noorgrant·3mo ago

a useful second-opinion prompt, minus the vague advice

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Noor Grant

Give me a short checklist for a useful second-opinion prompt. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Put the source of truth in the prompt - [ ] Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - [ ] Add a stop condition before tool use - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages
3411.2k

Browse by tag

#ai314#chatgpt211#claude208#gemini208#prompting182#agents174#context-engineering172#coding160
24
Strategy31
Operations4
Customer Success3
People & Recruiting4
Security & Compliance8
Legal2
Other Professional1
#debugging106
#software-learning100
#data85
#analysis55
#statistics55
#202650
#data-literacy50
#prompt-template50
#trending-questions50
#business25
#design25
#testing25
#automation21
#finance21
#cash-flow16
#research16