PitHub
HomeExplore
New pit
MCP serverSave straight from your agent
About usHow it worksFAQBlogContact us
Sign in
PitHub
Sign in
HomeExploreCreateSign in

Explore

Loading…

Explore

SQL, reporting, analysis, and data operations

ActiveNewMost usedRecommended
AllAI & Prompt Engineering324Engineering176Data & Analytics89Product4

Browse by tag

#ai314#chatgpt211#claude208#gemini208#prompting182#agents174#context-engineering172#coding160
Design28
Sales2
Marketing4
Finance24
Strategy31
Operations4
Customer Success3
People & Recruiting4
Security & Compliance8
Legal2
Other Professional1
Data & AnalyticsClear filters
KAKai Nolan@kainolan·2mo ago

How I ask for help with a dashboard that answers one question

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Kai Nolan

Be blunt about my plan for a dashboard that answers one question. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, keep assumptions next to the metric.

Show all 3 messages
3304.1k
CECelia Ramos@celiaramos·3mo ago

I finally found a good way to learn cohort analysis without mixing time grains

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Celia Ramos

I want to learn cohort analysis without mixing time grains, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain cohort analysis without mixing time grains in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.9k
LILina Bennett@linabennett·2mo ago

A smaller way to tackle metrics with fuzzy definitions

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Lina Bennett

For metrics with fuzzy definitions, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For metrics with fuzzy definitions, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages
3303.6k
TOTomas Varga@tomasvarga·3mo ago

Forked from@evakovac/The separating model mistakes from missing context tutor prompt I saved

I finally found a good way to learn data cleaning rules you can reverse

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Tomas Varga

I want to learn data cleaning rules you can reverse, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain data cleaning rules you can reverse in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.8k
LULucia Marin@luciamarin·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about reading uncertainty in a dashboard

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Lucia Marin

I want to learn reading uncertainty in a dashboard, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain reading uncertainty in a dashboard in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6414.3k
JAJasper Wong@jasperwong·2mo ago

A practice-first plan for data cleaning rules you can reverse

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Jasper Wong

I want to learn data cleaning rules you can reverse, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain data cleaning rules you can reverse in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6212.5k
AMAmara Ross@amaraross·2mo ago

ChatGPT was overcomplicating messy survey responses, so I reset the question

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Amara Ross

Be blunt about my plan for messy survey responses. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

ChatGPTgpt-5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, keep assumptions next to the metric.

Show all 3 messages
3402.1k
MAMax Ford@maxford·3mo ago

My notes from fixing a chart for a skeptical audience

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Max Ford

I am stuck on a chart for a skeptical audience. I need to choose and annotate a chart so the claim and uncertainty are both visible, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

ChatGPTgpt-5

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Fix the grain before calculating. 2. Keep assumptions next to the metric. 3. Show uncertainty in the output. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3403.6k
SISilas Berg@silasberg·3mo ago

writing a metric contract: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Silas Berg

I want to learn writing a metric contract, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain writing a metric contract in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.5k
DADalia Nasser@dalianasser·3mo ago

checking an A/B test before celebrating: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Dalia Nasser

I want to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain checking an A/B test before celebrating in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314k
LULuca Reed@lucareed·3mo ago

A smaller way to tackle cohort retention

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Luca Reed

For cohort retention, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For cohort retention, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages
3403.3k
EMEmil Novak@emilnovak·2mo ago

I finally found a good way to learn reading uncertainty in a dashboard

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Emil Novak

I want to learn reading uncertainty in a dashboard, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain reading uncertainty in a dashboard in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6312.5k
ALAlina Petrov@alinapetrov·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about data cleaning rules you can reverse

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Alina Petrov

I want to learn data cleaning rules you can reverse, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain data cleaning rules you can reverse in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.8k
FIFinn Sato@finnsato·3mo ago

I needed a usable answer on CSV files from five vendors

This started as a messy question about CSV files from five vendors. The follow-up made the answer practical.

Finn Sato

I am stuck on CSV files from five vendors. I need to reconcile schemas, units, missing values, and duplicates across vendor exports, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Fix the grain before calculating. 2. Keep assumptions next to the metric. 3. Show uncertainty in the output. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3403.8k
MIMicah Ellis@micahellis·3mo ago

The checking an A/B test before celebrating tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Micah Ellis

Tutor me on checking an A/B test before celebrating. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one wor

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain checking an A/B test before celebrating in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.1k
NENeha Kapoor@nehakapoor·2mo ago

A practice-first plan for cohort analysis without mixing time grains

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Neha Kapoor

I want to learn cohort analysis without mixing time grains, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain cohort analysis without mixing time grains in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6411.6k
LULuca Reed@lucareed·2mo ago

The cohort retention prompt I actually kept

A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.

Luca Reed

Help me calculate and explain retention cohorts without mixing calendar and lifecycle time. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendatio

ChatGPTgpt-5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For cohort retention, I would start with these checks: - Fix the grain before calculating - Keep assumptions next to the metric - Show uncertainty in the output If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
3302.2k
KAKai Nolan@kainolan·3mo ago

Gemini found the hole in my a dashboard that answers one question plan

This started as a messy question about a dashboard that answers one question. The follow-up made the answer practical.

Kai Nolan

For a dashboard that answers one question, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For a dashboard that answers one question, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages
3403.8k
KAKai Nolan@kainolan·3mo ago

What finally made a dashboard that answers one question click for me

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Kai Nolan

Help me cut a crowded dashboard down to the measures needed for a real decision. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendation. Otherwis

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For a dashboard that answers one question, I would start with these checks: - Fix the grain before calculating - Keep assumptions next to the metric - Show uncertainty in the output If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
3302.6k
IDIdris Bello@idrisbello·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about writing a metric contract

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Idris Bello

I want to learn writing a metric contract, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain writing a metric contract in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6212.2k
FIFinn Sato@finnsato·4mo ago

CSV files from five vendors, minus the vague advice

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Finn Sato

Give me a short checklist for CSV files from five vendors. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Fix the grain before calculating - [ ] Keep assumptions next to the metric - [ ] Show uncertainty in the output - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages
3303.8k
PRPriya Hsu@priyahsu·3mo ago

My notes from fixing an experiment readout

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Priya Hsu

I am stuck on an experiment readout. I need to analyze an A/B test with guardrails, uncertainty, and practical significance, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

ChatGPTgpt-5

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Fix the grain before calculating. 2. Keep assumptions next to the metric. 3. Show uncertainty in the output. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3303.4k
ZUZuri Mensah@zurimensah·4mo ago

The cohort analysis without mixing time grains tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Zuri Mensah

Tutor me on cohort analysis without mixing time grains. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain cohort analysis without mixing time grains in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.9k
PRPriya Hsu@priyahsu·4mo ago

A blunt review of my approach to an experiment readout

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Priya Hsu

Give me a short checklist for an experiment readout. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Fix the grain before calculating - [ ] Keep assumptions next to the metric - [ ] Show uncertainty in the output - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages
3403.4k
AMAmara Ross@amaraross·4mo ago

I needed a usable answer on messy survey responses

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Amara Ross

I am stuck on messy survey responses. I need to clean and code free-text survey answers without hiding disagreement, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Fix the grain before calculating. 2. Keep assumptions next to the metric. 3. Show uncertainty in the output. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3303.5k
LILina Bennett@linabennett·4mo ago

I asked Gemini for a second opinion on metrics with fuzzy definitions

I wanted help with metrics with fuzzy definitions without pretending the model knew facts I had not provided.

Lina Bennett

Be blunt about my plan for metrics with fuzzy definitions. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, keep assumptions next to the metric.

Show all 3 messages
3403.9k
MAMaya Torres@mayatorres·4mo ago

A practice-first plan for writing a metric contract

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Maya Torres

I want to learn writing a metric contract, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain writing a metric contract in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.6k
MAMalik Johnson@malikjohnson·4mo ago

The data cleaning rules you can reverse tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Malik Johnson

Tutor me on data cleaning rules you can reverse. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain data cleaning rules you can reverse in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.5k
ADAdrian Cho@adriancho·4mo ago

The reading uncertainty in a dashboard tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Adrian Cho

Tutor me on reading uncertainty in a dashboard. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked e

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain reading uncertainty in a dashboard in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6213k
FIFinn Sato@finnsato·2mo ago

The question that cleaned up CSV files from five vendors

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Finn Sato

Help me reconcile schemas, units, missing values, and duplicates across vendor exports. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendation. O

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For CSV files from five vendors, I would start with these checks: - Fix the grain before calculating - Keep assumptions next to the metric - Show uncertainty in the output If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
330968
#debugging106
#software-learning100
#data85
#analysis55
#statistics55
#202650
#data-literacy50
#prompt-template50
#trending-questions50
#business25
#design25
#testing25
#automation21
#finance21
#cash-flow16
#research16