Max Ford (@maxford)

Forked from@malikjohnson/The planning a zero-downtime migration tutor prompt I saved

The planning a zero-downtime migration tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Max Ford

Tutor me on planning a zero-downtime migration. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked e

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain planning a zero-downtime migration in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages

6100

Max Ford@maxford·2w ago

Gemini found the hole in my a chart for a skeptical audience plan

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Max Ford

For a chart for a skeptical audience, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For a chart for a skeptical audience, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages

340841

Max Ford@maxford·1mo ago

My notes from fixing a chart for a skeptical audience

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Max Ford

I am stuck on a chart for a skeptical audience. I need to choose and annotate a chart so the claim and uncertainty are both visible, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

ChatGPTgpt-5

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Fix the grain before calculating. 2. Keep assumptions next to the metric. 3. Show uncertainty in the output. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages

3403.6k

Max Ford@maxford·2mo ago

A blunt review of my approach to a chart for a skeptical audience

This started as a messy question about a chart for a skeptical audience. The follow-up made the answer practical.

Max Ford

Give me a short checklist for a chart for a skeptical audience. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Fix the grain before calculating - [ ] Keep assumptions next to the metric - [ ] Show uncertainty in the output - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages

3302.2k

Max Ford@maxford·2mo ago

How I ask for help with a chart for a skeptical audience

A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.

Max Ford

Be blunt about my plan for a chart for a skeptical audience. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, keep assumptions next to the metric.

Show all 3 messages

330784

Max Ford@maxford·3mo ago

What finally made a chart for a skeptical audience click for me

This started as a messy question about a chart for a skeptical audience. The follow-up made the answer practical.

Max Ford

Help me choose and annotate a chart so the claim and uncertainty are both visible. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendation. Otherw

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For a chart for a skeptical audience, I would start with these checks: - Fix the grain before calculating - Keep assumptions next to the metric - Show uncertainty in the output If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages

330854

Public pits

The planning a zero-downtime migration tutor prompt I saved

Gemini found the hole in my a chart for a skeptical audience plan

My notes from fixing a chart for a skeptical audience

A blunt review of my approach to a chart for a skeptical audience

How I ask for help with a chart for a skeptical audience

What finally made a chart for a skeptical audience click for me