PitHub
HomeExplore
New pit
MCP serverSave straight from your agent
About usHow it worksFAQBlogContact us
Sign in
PitHub
Sign in
HomeExploreCreateSign in

Explore

Loading…

Explore

Tagged #prompting

ActiveNewMost usedRecommended
AllAI & Prompt Engineering324Engineering176Data & Analytics89Product4

Browse by tag

#ai314#chatgpt211#claude208#gemini208#prompting182#agents174#context-engineering172#coding160
Design28
Sales2
Marketing4
Finance24
Strategy31
Operations4
Customer Success3
People & Recruiting4
Security & Compliance8
Legal2
Other Professional1
#promptingClear filters
ZUZuri Mensah@zurimensah·2mo ago

Forked from@celiaramos/I finally found a good way to learn testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini

The testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Zuri Mensah

Tutor me on testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6315.1k
ALAlina Petrov@alinapetrov·2mo ago

What I was getting wrong about writing eval cases before changing a prompt

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Alina Petrov

I want to learn writing eval cases before changing a prompt, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain writing eval cases before changing a prompt in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6315.2k
OSOscar Lind@oscarlind·2mo ago

What I was getting wrong about tool approval gates for AI agents

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Oscar Lind

I want to learn tool approval gates for AI agents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain tool approval gates for AI agents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214k
DADarius Cole@dariuscole·2mo ago

What I was getting wrong about context engineering for reliable agents

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Darius Cole

I want to learn context engineering for reliable agents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain context engineering for reliable agents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6315k
DADalia Nasser@dalianasser·2mo ago

prompt injection basics for tool users: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Dalia Nasser

I want to learn prompt injection basics for tool users, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain prompt injection basics for tool users in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.9k
MAMaya Torres@mayatorres·2mo ago

A practice-first plan for using examples to teach output quality

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Maya Torres

I want to learn using examples to teach output quality, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain using examples to teach output quality in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.2k
MIMicah Ellis@micahellis·2mo ago

Forked from@kenjifujita/I finally found a good way to learn prompt injection basics for tool users

The prompt injection basics for tool users tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Micah Ellis

Tutor me on prompt injection basics for tool users. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one work

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain prompt injection basics for tool users in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.5k
HAHaruto Abe@harutoabe·3mo ago

tool approval gates for AI agents: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Haruto Abe

I want to learn tool approval gates for AI agents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain tool approval gates for AI agents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.2k
SISilas Berg@silasberg·2mo ago

separating model mistakes from missing context: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Silas Berg

I want to learn separating model mistakes from missing context, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain separating model mistakes from missing context in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.1k
DADarius Cole@dariuscole·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about human review for automated workflows

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Darius Cole

I want to learn human review for automated workflows, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain human review for automated workflows in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.6k
ALAlina Petrov@alinapetrov·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about reducing hallucinations with verification steps

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Alina Petrov

I want to learn reducing hallucinations with verification steps, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain reducing hallucinations with verification steps in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.1k
JAJasper Wong@jasperwong·3mo ago

A practice-first plan for structured outputs that fail safely

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Jasper Wong

I want to learn structured outputs that fail safely, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain structured outputs that fail safely in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.1k
INInes Navarro@inesnavarro·2mo ago

Forked from@aminafarah/I finally found a good way to learn designing a useful agent handoff

The designing a useful agent handoff tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Ines Navarro

Tutor me on designing a useful agent handoff. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked exa

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain designing a useful agent handoff in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.2k
AMAmina Farah@aminafarah·2mo ago

I finally found a good way to learn human review for automated workflows

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Amina Farah

I want to learn human review for automated workflows, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain human review for automated workflows in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6413.2k
MAMaya Torres@mayatorres·3mo ago

A practice-first plan for separating model mistakes from missing context

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Maya Torres

I want to learn separating model mistakes from missing context, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain separating model mistakes from missing context in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6314.5k
RORonan Byrne@ronanbyrne·2mo ago

A practice-first plan for tracking prompt versions and results

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Ronan Byrne

I want to learn tracking prompt versions and results, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain tracking prompt versions and results in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6312k
LULucia Marin@luciamarin·3mo ago

What I was getting wrong about building a small research agent

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Lucia Marin

I want to learn building a small research agent, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain building a small research agent in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6414.7k
MAMateo Chen@mateochen·3mo ago

The structured output that stays readable prompt I actually kept

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Mateo Chen

Help me return valid JSON while keeping the substance useful to a human reviewer. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendation. Otherwi

ChatGPTgpt-5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For structured output that stays readable, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages
3314k
SOSoraya Aziz@sorayaaziz·2mo ago

grounding answers in source documents: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Soraya Aziz

I want to learn grounding answers in source documents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain grounding answers in source documents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6312.6k
OSOscar Lind@oscarlind·2mo ago

What I was getting wrong about deciding when an agent should stop

Sharing the correction because the mistake looked reasonable until I tested it.

Oscar Lind

I want to learn deciding when an agent should stop, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain deciding when an agent should stop in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6212.8k
QUQuinn Harper@quinnharper·3mo ago

A practice-first plan for grounding answers in source documents

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Quinn Harper

I want to learn grounding answers in source documents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain grounding answers in source documents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.4k
KEKenji Fujita@kenjifujita·4mo ago

Forked from@zurimensah/The using retrieval practice for diagrams tutor prompt I saved

I finally found a good way to learn prompt injection basics for tool users

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Kenji Fujita

I want to learn prompt injection basics for tool users, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain prompt injection basics for tool users in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6224.9k
CECelia Ramos@celiaramos·2mo ago

I finally found a good way to learn deciding when an agent should stop

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Celia Ramos

I want to learn deciding when an agent should stop, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain deciding when an agent should stop in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6311.9k
EMEmil Novak@emilnovak·3mo ago

I finally found a good way to learn building a small research agent

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Emil Novak

I want to learn building a small research agent, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain building a small research agent in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6323.3k
MAMalik Johnson@malikjohnson·2mo ago

Forked from@tomasvarga/I finally found a good way to learn structured outputs that fail safely

The structured outputs that fail safely tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Malik Johnson

Tutor me on structured outputs that fail safely. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain structured outputs that fail safely in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6311.8k
FAFatima Saleh@fatimasaleh·3mo ago

writing eval cases before changing a prompt: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Fatima Saleh

I want to learn writing eval cases before changing a prompt, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain writing eval cases before changing a prompt in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6412.8k
JOJonah Martin@jonahmartin·2mo ago

The checklist I use for a prompt for honest product feedback

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Jonah Martin

I am stuck on a prompt for honest product feedback. I need to review a product idea without defaulting to praise or inventing market evidence, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages
3412.4k
NENeha Kapoor@nehakapoor·2mo ago

A practice-first plan for testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini

I asked for a plan built around attempts and feedback, not a list of resources.

Neha Kapoor

I want to learn testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain testing prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6412.3k
MIMicah Ellis@micahellis·4mo ago

The tracking prompt versions and results tutor prompt I saved

This version makes the model wait for an answer, correct selectively, and keep an error log.

Micah Ellis

Tutor me on tracking prompt versions and results. My current level: [beginner / some experience / advanced] What I need to do with it: [real task, exam, project, or conversation] Time available today: [minutes] Material I am using: [paste notes, example, code, data, or source] Teach one small idea at a time. Start with a two-question diagnostic. Wait for my answer before explaining. Use one worked

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain tracking prompt versions and results in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6214.8k
DADalia Nasser@dalianasser·4mo ago

tracking prompt versions and results: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Dalia Nasser

I want to learn tracking prompt versions and results, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain tracking prompt versions and results in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages
6313.8k
#debugging106
#software-learning100
#data85
#analysis55
#statistics55
#202650
#data-literacy50
#prompt-template50
#trending-questions50
#business25
#design25
#testing25
#automation21
#finance21
#cash-flow16
#research16