Forked from@noorgrant/The question that cleaned up a useful second-opinion prompt
The question that cleaned up a useful second-opinion prompt
The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.
Help me challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your
This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For a useful second-opinion prompt, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.