Forked from@noorgrant/I needed a usable answer on a useful second-opinion prompt
I needed a usable answer on a useful second-opinion prompt
I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.
I am stuck on a useful second-opinion prompt. I need to challenge a plan, find hidden assumptions, and suggest the smallest test that could disprove it, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?
First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.