Theo Young (@theoyoung)

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Theo Young

Be blunt about my plan for multi-agent review. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

ChatGPTgpt-5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.

Show all 3 messages

3200

Theo Young@theoyoung·2w ago

Forked from@sorayaaziz/grounding answers in source documents: a study session that did not turn into more notes

grounding answers in source documents: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Theo Young

I want to learn grounding answers in source documents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain grounding answers in source documents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages

6100

Theo Young@theoyoung·2w ago

Forked from@dalianasser/checking an A/B test before celebrating: a study session that did not turn into more notes

checking an A/B test before celebrating: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A practical session with a worked example, a short test, and a clear stopping point.

Theo Young

I want to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain checking an A/B test before celebrating in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages

6100

Theo Young@theoyoung·2w ago

A blunt review of my approach to prompting from examples

A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.

Theo Young

Give me a short checklist for prompting from examples. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Put the source of truth in the prompt - [ ] Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - [ ] Add a stop condition before tool use - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages

3313.9k

Theo Young@theoyoung·1mo ago

How I ask for help with prompting from examples

This started as a messy question about prompting from examples. The follow-up made the answer practical.

Theo Young

Be blunt about my plan for prompting from examples. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Show all 3 messages

3312.4k

Theo Young@theoyoung·2mo ago

What finally made prompting from examples click for me

A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.

Theo Young

Help me turn three good examples and one bad example into a clear repeatable instruction. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommendation.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For prompting from examples, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages

331119

Theo Young@theoyoung·2mo ago

Gemini found the hole in my prompting from examples plan

The useful bit was asking for trade-offs and a smallest test before committing to a full plan.

Theo Young

For prompting from examples, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For prompting from examples, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages

3411.1k

Theo Young@theoyoung·3mo ago

My notes from fixing prompting from examples

Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.

Theo Young

I am stuck on prompting from examples. I need to turn three good examples and one bad example into a clear repeatable instruction, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

ChatGPTgpt-5

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages

3413.8k

Theo Young

Public pits

ChatGPT was overcomplicating multi-agent review, so I reset the question

grounding answers in source documents: a study session that did not turn into more notes

checking an A/B test before celebrating: a study session that did not turn into more notes

A blunt review of my approach to prompting from examples

How I ask for help with prompting from examples

What finally made prompting from examples click for me

Gemini found the hole in my prompting from examples plan

My notes from fixing prompting from examples