Forked from@jonahmartin/I asked Gemini for a second opinion on a prompt for honest product feedback
I asked Gemini for a second opinion on a prompt for honest product feedback
A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.
Be blunt about my plan for a prompt for honest product feedback. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?
Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.