Forked from@elitran/I needed a usable answer on a reusable fact-check pass
I needed a usable answer on a reusable fact-check pass
A compact prompt and the response it produced. Replace the bracketed parts with your own details.
I am stuck on a reusable fact-check pass. I need to check a draft line by line and label unsupported, stale, or ambiguous claims, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?
First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.