Nadia Meyer (@nadiameyer)

Forked from@ashavega/Gemini found the hole in my a customer-support copilot plan

Gemini found the hole in my a customer-support copilot plan

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Nadia Meyer

For a customer-support copilot, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For a customer-support copilot, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages

3200

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·2w ago

Forked from@emilnovak/I finally found a good way to learn grounding answers in source documents

I finally found a good way to learn grounding answers in source documents

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Nadia Meyer

I want to learn grounding answers in source documents, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

ChatGPTgpt-5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain grounding answers in source documents in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages

6100

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·2w ago

Forked from@kenjifujita/I finally found a good way to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating

I finally found a good way to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating

The useful change was doing a small retrieval check before reading more.

Nadia Meyer

I want to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating, but I keep collecting explanations instead of getting better at it. I have 35 minutes. Start by checking what I already know.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Good. Do these without looking anything up: 1. Explain checking an A/B test before celebrating in two sentences. 2. Give one situation where you would use it and one where you would not. I am checking your current model, not your vocabulary. A partial answer is more useful than a polished guess.

Show all 6 messages

6100

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·2w ago

I stopped guessing about meeting notes into decisions

The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.

Nadia Meyer

For meeting notes into decisions, should I build a complete plan first or test one small slice? I have limited time and I do not want throwaway work.

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

Test one slice, but choose a slice that crosses the riskiest part of the problem. A tiny easy demo will only prove the easy part. Use this decision rule: - If reversing the choice is cheap, try it. - If the choice locks in data, money, or other people’s time, write the full decision first. - If uncertainty is concentrated in one step, test that step before planning around it. For meeting notes into decisions, make the first test produce evidence you can compare, not just something that looks complete.

Show all 3 messages

3312.4k

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·1mo ago

I needed a usable answer on meeting notes into decisions

Not magic wording, just enough context and a clear definition of done. Easy to adapt.

Nadia Meyer

I am stuck on meeting notes into decisions. I need to extract decisions, owners, deadlines, and unresolved questions from raw meeting notes, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once. 1. Put the source of truth in the prompt. 2. Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in. 3. Add a stop condition before tool use. Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.

Show all 3 messages

3313.9k

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·2mo ago

meeting notes into decisions, minus the vague advice

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Nadia Meyer

Give me a short checklist for meeting notes into decisions. I want something I can run before I call the work done.

Geminigemini-2.5-pro

Use this pass: - [ ] The goal is one sentence and names the user or decision - [ ] Inputs are current, relevant, and traceable - [ ] Assumptions are visible - [ ] Put the source of truth in the prompt - [ ] Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - [ ] Add a stop condition before tool use - [ ] One failure case has been tested - [ ] The next owner and next action are clear If you cannot check an item, mark it unknown. Do not quietly treat unknown as done.

Show all 3 messages

3413.8k

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·2mo ago

ChatGPT was overcomplicating meeting notes into decisions, so I reset the question

I wanted help with meeting notes into decisions without pretending the model knew facts I had not provided.

Nadia Meyer

Be blunt about my plan for meeting notes into decisions. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?

ChatGPTgpt-5

Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.

Show all 3 messages

3411k

Nadia Meyer@nadiameyer·3mo ago

The question that cleaned up meeting notes into decisions

I kept the useful constraints and dropped the role-play. It works better when the missing details are stated plainly.

Nadia Meyer

Help me extract decisions, owners, deadlines, and unresolved questions from raw meeting notes. Context: - Goal: [what a good result lets me do] - Current situation: [paste notes, draft, data, or constraints] - Audience: [who will use the result] - Deadline or limit: [time, budget, tools, length] Before answering, ask up to three questions only if the answers would materially change your recommenda

Claudeclaude-opus-4.5

This is usable as written. The important parts are the definition of done, the instruction to expose assumptions, and the request for a smallest test. For meeting notes into decisions, I would start with these checks: - Put the source of truth in the prompt - Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in - Add a stop condition before tool use If you share real material, remove anything private first and replace bracketed fields with concrete details.

Show all 3 messages

3412.5k

Public pits

Gemini found the hole in my a customer-support copilot plan

I finally found a good way to learn grounding answers in source documents

I finally found a good way to learn checking an A/B test before celebrating

I stopped guessing about meeting notes into decisions

I needed a usable answer on meeting notes into decisions

meeting notes into decisions, minus the vague advice

ChatGPT was overcomplicating meeting notes into decisions, so I reset the question

The question that cleaned up meeting notes into decisions