Forked from@elitran/ChatGPT was overcomplicating a reusable fact-check pass, so I reset the question
ChatGPT was overcomplicating a reusable fact-check pass, so I reset the question
Sharing the wording because it gave me something I could check instead of a confident wall of text.
Be blunt about my plan for a reusable fact-check pass. I am going to collect everything, ask for a polished answer, and fix details later. What is likely to go wrong?
Three things. - “Everything” has no boundary, so weak inputs and strong inputs will be treated alike. - A polished answer can hide missing evidence. Ask for gaps and assumptions before prose. - “Fix details later” means there is no acceptance test now. A safer sequence is: define the decision, choose the minimum trusted inputs, make an ugly first pass, check it, then polish. For this task, mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.