I am stuck on multi-agent review. I need to split a task between a maker, a verifier, and a final editor without duplicated work, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?
I needed a usable answer on multi-agent review
The first answers were broad enough to be useless. This version asks for assumptions, evidence, and a next step.
First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once.
- Put the source of truth in the prompt.
- Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.
- Add a stop condition before tool use.
Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.
The smaller decision was the missing piece. I was asking for the whole system at once.
3 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.