I am stuck on a research prompt that cites its work. I need to research a question, separate facts from inference, and attach sources to each claim, but my current attempt is getting vague and too big. What would you check first?
Forked from @leofischer/My notes from fixing a research prompt that cites its work
My notes from fixing a research prompt that cites its work
This started as a messy question about a research prompt that cites its work. The follow-up made the answer practical.
First, shrink the decision. Do not solve the whole subject at once.
- Put the source of truth in the prompt.
- Mark missing evidence instead of filling it in.
- Add a stop condition before tool use.
Write down the result you need by the end of this session. Then choose one input you trust and make a first pass that can be checked. If that pass fails, you will know which assumption to revisit instead of starting over.
The smaller decision was the missing piece. I was asking for the whole system at once.
2 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.